MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2597567664 · doi:10.1149/2.0611706jes

Carbon Nanotubes Chemically Modified by Metal Phthalocyanines with Excellent Electrocatalytic Activity to Li/SOCl<sub>2</sub>Battery

2017· article· en· W2597567664 on OpenAlexaff
Yan Gao, Siwen Li, Xiao Wang, Ronglan Zhang, Gai Zhang, Ying Zheng, Jianshe Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCarbon nanotubeCatalysisElectrochemistryCyclic voltammetryX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyBattery (electricity)Thionyl chlorideMetalLithium (medication)Materials scienceInorganic chemistryChemistryChemical engineeringElectrodeChlorideNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs)-templated metal phthalocyanines (MPc) (M = Mn(II), Fe(II), Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II), Zn(II)) assemblies (CNTs-CONH-MPc) were synthesized and characterized by IR, XRD, SEM, XPS. The lithium-thionyl chloride (Li/SOCl 2 ) cells using CNTs-CONH-MPc as catalysts showed excellent performance, which the capacities increased by 15.44–88.49%, and the initial voltages improved to 3.09–3.22 V. The sequence of the electrochemical catalytic performance of CNTs-CONH-MPc was ranked by central metal ion: Co > Ni > Mn > Fe > Cu > Zn. Based on cyclic voltammetry measurements, the reasonable mechanism is proposed and the role of catalyst is verified. The modified CNTs by MPc greatly promoted the electronic transmission, which significantly improved the performance and the initial voltage of Li/SOCl 2 battery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207