Percepción De Seguridad Del Turismo Extranjero Que Arriba En Casas Rodantes a Playas De Mazatlán (Sinaloa) (Security Perception of Foreigners Who Travel in House Trailers at Mazatlan Beaches (Sinaloa))
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Spanish Abstract: El presente articulo recoge la percepcion de seguridad que tienen los visitantes que viajan en casas rodantes y se hospedan en establecimientos conocidos como trailer parks en las playas del puerto de Mazatlan, principal destino turistico en el estado de Sinaloa (Mexico). Ademas, se recopila informacion sociodemografica y economica de los respondientes por medio de la aplicacion de un cuestionario como instrumento de recoleccion de datos. Asi mismo, se realizan correlaciones para demostrar la asociacion entre quienes cambian sus planes de viajes en respuesta a las advertencias realizadas por el gobierno del pais de origen, sean estos de EE. UU. y/o de Canada. Entre los resultados es posible identificar la estadia y el gasto promedio diario y mensual, tambien elementos que inciden en su decision de viaje. Finalmente, se analiza el papel que juega la seguridad en algunos sitios de atraccion turistica dentro del destino, asi como en los servicios de transporte, sus playas e impresiones acerca de las alertas de viaje que emiten autoridades de Gobierno estadounidenses y canadienses. English Abstract: This article describes the security perception of visitors traveling in rvs who stay in establishments known as trailer parks in the port of Mazatlan, main tourist destination of the state of Sinaloa (Mexico). In addition, sociodemographic and economic information of respondents is collected through a questionnaire as an instrument of data collection. The association between those who change their travel plans in response to the warnings given by the government of the country of origin, whether US and / or Canada was also studied. Among the results it is possible to identify stay and daily and monthly average spending also elements that influence their travel decisions. Finally, the role of security in places of tourist attraction in the destination, as well as transport services, beaches and impressions about that issue travel alerts us authorities and Canadian government is analyzed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".