Alkali-Oxygen Impregnation Prior to Steam Pretreating Poplar Wood Chips Enhances Selective Lignin Modification and Removal while Maximizing Carbohydrate Recovery, Cellulose Accessibility, and Enzymatic Hydrolysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poplar wood chips were impregnated with oxygen and sodium carbonate at relatively mild conditions (110 and 135 °C) prior to steam pretreatment (210 °C, 5 min) with the goal of selectively fractionating and modifying lignin while improving overall carbohydrate recovery and the ease of enzymatic hydrolysis of the cellulose. Using these pretreatment conditions more than 80% of the carbohydrate components (cellulose and hemicellulose) were retained in the water-insoluble fraction, an 18% increase in hemicellulose recovery was achieved, while 58% of the original lignin could be extracted. Alkaline oxygen impregnated steam pretreatment also enriched the bulk acid group content of the substrate from 33 to 156 mmol/kg, consequently increasing both the water retention value of the substrate from 2.5 to 2.9 and cellulose accessibility as indicated by the increased adsorption of Direct Orange dye from 119 to 146 mg/g. The combination of lignin modification/removal enhanced substrate swelling and increased cellulose accessibility resulting in enzymatic hydrolysis yields of 86% of the cellulose and xylan after 48 h at an enzyme loading of 20 mg/g glucan and a solids loading of 10%. Impregnation with either oxygen or alkali alone, prior to steam pretreatment, was far less effective than impregnation with the alkali/oxygen combination. Alkali-oxygen steam pretreatment resulted in the retention of more carbohydrate in the water-insoluble fraction while increasing the ease of lignin extraction, enhanced cellulose accessibility, and better enzymatic hydrolysis of the cellulose component.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".