Bibliographic record
Abstract
A previously healthy 12-month-old Caucasian girl presented with reddish, brown papules over the torso, legs, arms and scalp since 2 months of age. Past history was only significant for atopic dermatitis, torticollis, plagiocephaly, esotropia and a recent hospitalization for cervical lymphadenitis. Her development was normal; her immunizations were up to date and she had no known allergies. Family history was significant for eczema. No one else in the family had a similar eruption. On physical examination, the patient was a well-appearing infant in no apparent distress with a normal general examination, with no hepatosplenomegaly and no regional lymphadenopathy. She had multiple erythematous and hyperpigmented, 5-mm to 7-mm, oval macules and papules over the chest, back, arms and legs with some scalp involvement (Figure 1). There was no urtication on rubbing. A biopsy revealed the diagnosis. ... The biopsy revealed perivascular and interstitial infiltrates of mast cells confirming a diagnosis of urticarial pigmentosa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".