Bibliographic record
Abstract
This book offers new perspectives on how community reproduces sexuality in the changing social environment brought on by the HIV/AIDS epidemic in Malawi. Based on authentic anthropological data, this volume shows how community uses theatre and masks to influence individual behaviour relating to sexuality. As the book challenges the dichotomy between traditional and modern ways of understanding community, it offers a commentary on international health education. This volume is used as textbook at universities and polytechnics. It opens a window for any reader interested in understanding the complexities of sexual practice in African life.\n\nDavid Korpela has lived 16 years in Africa, 12 years in Kenya and 4 years in Malawi, where this research is based. Since his youth, he has been exploring the culture of communities in this book in collaboration with the Canadian anthropologist Claude Boucher. Korpela completed his BA at Queen's University, Canada. This volume is based on his Masters' Thesis at the University of Jyväskylä. Korpela is currently working as the Country Representative for Finn Church Aid in Haiti.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".