MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2597810557

The beneficial influence of a well regulated nationality: a sermon delivered before the St. Andrew's society, of Montreal, on St. Andrew's day, Nov. 30th, 1857, in Saint Gabriel Street Scotch church.

2014· article· en· W2597810557 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anna Francina Kemp

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSermonSAINTNationalityHistoryMedia studiesGerontologyEnvironmental ethicsArt historySociologyMedicineImmigrationPhilosophyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Psalm cxxvi.3 -" The Lord hath done great things for us, whereof we are glad."We are met this day, by the blessing of God, to hold our National festival, to unite our hearts together with joy and gladness at the remembrance of the past, and to say, " The Lord hath done great things for us, whereof we are glad."This day it is our privilege to live over again in spirit the days of our happy youth, to realise all that is good and great in the history of our time-honored Nation, to stimu- late within us feelings of ardent patriotism, and to give expression to our brotherly love, by extending sympathy and substantial kindness to our countrymen in distress.The objects of the St. Andrew's Society must be regarded by every leal-hearted Scotchman as worthy of the highest praise, and as in harmony with the best and noblest prin- ciples of our nature.We endeavor to extend a friendly hand to the immigrant, to welcome him to this large, free and magnificent country.We seek to aid those who, by the dispensations of Providence, have been brought into poverty and distress.In these things we seek besides to illustrate and adorn the common brotherhood which knits us to those of our own land, kindred and tongue.It can- not be said of Scotchmen that they have ever been indifferent to the wants or the sorrows of their countrymen.None of us, I believe, can hear the Doric familiar language of our 898(58

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0280.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207