MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2597825565 · doi:10.1109/vtcfall.2016.7881192

Reducing Energy Consumption for Reconfiguration in Cloud Data Centers

2016· article· en· W2597825565 on OpenAlexaff
Omar Chakroun, Soumaya Cherkaoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingEnergy consumptionDistributed computingLyapunov optimizationServerMobile cloud computingData centerControl reconfigurationElasticity (physics)UsabilityComputer networkEmbedded systemOperating systemEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mobile Cloud Computing (MCC) leverages mobile devices and infrastructure equipment to increase services accessibility. It uses increased devices computing capability to enhance services usability and ensure high availability. This growth in performances results in an increased interest for platforms use to accommodate a multitude of applications. To support such an increase in demand, new designs for resource management have to be implemented in order to reach usage optimality. In this work, we propose to design new algorithms to optimize MCC resources management techniques based on stochastic networks optimization. Our approach is focused on energy consumption optimization on the cloud data center side while ensuring resources elasticity to adapt to users' demands and insure a highly available platform. We elected an overclocking technique to enhance servers' capabilities and Lyapunov improvisation to ensure design stability and to minimize the energy cost. We perform extensive simulations under different charge conditions in order to prove the design effectiveness in ensuring the service with lower power consumption. Simulations results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed resources management design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207