Controlling the Implementation of the Public-private Partnership (PPP) Projects in the System of Local Strategic Management
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the involvement of the private capital and the management performed by the private sector, the public-private partnerships (PPP) will be able to weaken the financial constraints and to promote the efficient development of the public infrastructure as well as the provision of the public services. In order to increase the efficiency and the effectiveness of the implementation of the PPP agreements the local authorities are required to control their execution. The types and the forms of control, exercised by the akimats in the course of implementation of the PPP projects are described in this article, the stages of development of the PPP legal framework in the Republic of Kazakhstan are studied herein. The results of the study of the implementation of the investment projects are presented by the author; the factors, reducing the efficiency of use of the budgetary funds in the framework of the PPP projects, are defined. In the article, the basic directions of formation and development of the PPP projects implementation controlling system, including the establishment of the unified PPP information system, the introduction of the modern approaches to the effective planning and budgeting in the local authorities of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the conduct of the regular training programs for the experts of the control bodies in the field of PPP are defined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it