MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2597917626 · doi:10.1039/c7fd00086c

Observational constraints on particle acidity using measurements and modelling of particles and gases

2017· article· en· W2597917626 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. G. Murphy, Phillip Gregoire, Alex G. Tevlin, Gregory R. Wentworth, R. A. Ellis, M. Z. Markovic, Trevor C. VandenBoer

Bibliographic record

VenueFaraday Discussions · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Gas phaseChemistryParticle (ecology)Phase (matter)MineralogyPhysical chemistryEnvironmental chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In many parts of the world, the implementation of air quality regulations has led to significant decreases in SO 2 emissions with minimal impact on NH 3 emissions. In Canada and the United States, the molar ratio of NH 3 : SO 2 emissions has increased dramatically between 1990 and 2014. In many regions of North America, this will lead the molar ratio of NH x : SO 4 , where NH x is the sum of particle phase NH 4 + and gas phase NH 3 , and SO 4 is the sum of particle phase HSO 4 − and SO 4 2− , to exceed 2. A thermodynamic model (E-AIM model II) is used to investigate the sensitivity of particle pH, and the gas-particle partitioning of NH x and inorganic nitrate, to the atmospheric NH x : SO 4 ratio. Steep increases in pH and the gas fraction of NH x are found as NH x : SO 4 varies from below 1 to above 2. The sensitivity of the gas fraction of nitrate also depends strongly on temperature. The results show that if NH x : SO 4 exceeds 2, and the gas and particle phase NH x are in equilibrium, the particle pH will be above 2. Observations of the composition of particulate matter and gas phase NH 3 from two field campaigns in southern Canada in 2007 and 2012 have median NH x : SO 4 ratios of 3.8 and 25, respectively. These campaigns exhibited similar amounts of NH 3 , but very different particle phase loadings. Under these conditions, the pH values calculated using the observations as input to the E-AIM model were in the range of 1–4. The pH values were typically higher at night because the higher relative humidity increased the particle water content, diluting the acidity. The assumption of equilibration between the gas and particle phase NH x was evaluated by comparing the observed and modelled gas fraction of NH x . In general, E-AIM was able to reproduce the partitioning well, suggesting that the dominant constituents contributing to particle acidity were measured, and that the estimated pH values were realistic. These results suggest that regions of the world where the ratio of NH 3 : SO 2 emissions is beginning to exceed 2 on a molar basis may be experiencing rapid increases in aerosol pH of 1–3 pH units. This could have important consequences for the rates of condensed phase reactions that are acid-catalyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.259
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.039 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations108
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFaraday DiscussionsSame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207