MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2597946473

THE SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF SCHOOL HEALTH SUPPORT SERVICES FOR CHILDREN WITH DIABETES IN ONTARIO SCHOOLS: AN INSTITUTIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY

2017· dissertation· en· W2597946473 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lisa Watt

Bibliographic record

VenueMacSphere (McMaster University) · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEthnographySociologyPolitical scienceMedicinePedagogyAnthropology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis is an institutional ethnography (IE) examining the social organization of Community Care Access Centre School Health Support Services (CCAC SHSS) for children with diabetes in Ontario schools. More specifically, it explicates the social relations embedded in, and coordinating the work organization of mothering (parenting) and nursing in the school setting. The inquiry begins in my personal experience as a mother of a child with diabetes starting kindergarten, and the troubles I encountered in getting the care and attention needed to keep my child safe at school. Starting from experience, a place outside of theory and institutionalized categories and discourse, I set out on a journey to discover the social organization that coordinates my experience, and to seek answers to my query: how are school health supports put together in such a way that I, as a parent, am left feeling worried about my child’s safety when she is at school, have had to fight to secure the much needed ‘diabetes care’, and even then, am often called upon to provide voluntary supplementary healthcare work to ensure her safety at school?
\nI have structured this thesis into two main parts. The first part provides the set-up for this thesis. First, I orient readers to this distinctive way of doing an IE, directing their attention to how I used the core IE concepts in this research and calling upon them to read the remainder of the thesis taking up this distinctive theoretical and conceptual lens. Indeed, what we know and how we know it has much to do with how knowledge is socially organized. Then, I go on to examine the different ways of knowing about ‘diabetes care’, how these distinctive ways of knowing create a disjuncture for me as a parent and how this disjuncture is used to establish the research standpoint to begin and direct the explication. The last chapter in this part situates health supports for children with diabetes within the services provided by public-funded home care. I sketch three decades of the history of reform and organizational restructuring of home care in Ontario, in particular, the introduction of privatizing relations into the local practices of community nursing and the creation of CCACs. These relations of privatization reorganized the home care sector, the workforce, and the relation between the ‘state’ and its citizens. What went on before sets the groundwork for what can happen next, and it is under this context and conditions in which my inquiry is set.
\nThe second part consists of four academic journal manuscripts. They are the descriptive analysis for this IE. These four chapters describe what I have learned and discovered in doing this research, and three of them in particular provide an empirical analysis showing how school health supports for children with diabetes are put together such that the troubles I experienced came into being. These four chapters are conventionally referred to as research ‘findings’ in traditional qualitative research methodology. Each of these chapters speaks to a particular way of knowing about ‘diabetes care’. One focuses on parents’ experiential ways of knowing based on the actualities of their daily and nightly everyday world to show the amount of work and knowledge required to care for and to keep their children with diabetes alive; while the other three underscore the CCACs’ institutional ways of knowing about ‘diabetes care’ in the school setting. I show how these objectified ways of knowing derived from institutional texts (Standardized CCAC Medial Orders, information technology software and the Diabetes Checklist for Independence) are used to determine a child’s eligibility to receive health supports at school. These objectified textual forms of knowing are removed from the actualities of people’s real life circumstances, and differ significantly with how and what parents know is needed for their children with diabetes to stay well and safe at school. It is precisely this form of text-mediated social coordination that leaves parents feeling worried and draws them in to doing voluntary healthcare work at school, without which the child’s safety and the continuity of care is not possible.
\nTracing the institutional relations organizing how health support services for children with diabetes actually happen in the classroom, I show the kind of work expected of parents, and demonstrate that the CCAC SHSS policy and practices only ‘work’ as they should with the incorporation of parents’ ‘unauthorized’ knowledge and their ongoing voluntary complementary healthcare work. While it is in parents’ interests to ensure their children’s safety and well-being at school, there are differences between parents in how, and if, they can deliver their knowledge and resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacSphere (McMaster University)Same topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207