MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

(II)legitimacy of Knowledge and Exclusion: A Study of Margaret Atwood's Select Novels

2017· article· en· W2597950461 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vijayraj Kumawat, Rashmi Gaur

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Exclusion Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegitimacySociologyManagementMedia studiesPolitical scienceLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is a study of Canadian author Margaret Atwood's select fictional narratives reflecting how the ‘scientific’ knowledge tradition, in its practice, results in social exclusion of the individual subjects who do not conform to it. In order to explore the state of exclusion, it looks into how ‘the postmodern condition’ inherently brings with itself the idea of its own (il)legitimacy. This notion is explored on the basis of four considerations-Consensus, Speculativity, Doability and Narrativity-inherent in the discourses/disciplines. The postmodernist thinker Jean-Francois Lyotard's The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (1979) has been extensively referred to in understanding the (il)legitimacy of not only the scientific but also the non-scientific, but socially accepted forms of knowledge vis-à-vis Atwood's Alias Grace (1996) and The Blind Assassin (2000).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.637
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Exclusion StudiesSame topicUtopian, Dystopian, and Speculative FictionFrench-language works237,207