MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2597959081 · doi:10.1353/esc.2003.0045

Canadian Children’s Books: A Critical Guide to Authors and Illustrators by Raymond E. Jones, Jon C. Stott

2003· article· en· W2597959081 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
James Gellert

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicThemes in Literature Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTitle pageWhite (mutation)Variety (cybernetics)Art historyHistoryClassicsArtSociologyLibrary scienceComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Raymond E. Jones and Jon C. Stott. Canadian Children’s Books: A Critical Guide to Authors and Illustrators. Don Mills: Oxford DR 2000. Pp. 538. It is clear that in producing a critical guide to Canadian children’s authors and illustrators limited to 133 entries, co-authors Raymond Jones and Jon Stott faced important questions regarding the scope of the work, who should and should not be included in the volume, as well as how “critical” each entry should be. Both the “Introduction” to the work and the entries themselves answer these questions. In their brief introduction, which both provides a contextual framework for the entries and serves as a valuable, historical digest in itself, Jones and Stott review what are now regarded as touchstones in the development of Canadian children’s literature in English, beginning with the didactic urgings of Mrs H. Bayley in 1832. The introduction offers short annotations on the works noted, and identifies those that are especially significant from a variety of perspectives. Hence it is that Catherine Parr Traill’s survival tale, The Canadian Crusoes (1852), R. M. Ballantyne’s regional works (starting with Snowflakes and Sunbeams in 1856), and James De Mille’s school-based The Brethren of the White Cross series (begun in 1869) are identified, and some are expanded upon as entries later in the volume. Ernest Thompson Seton’s Wild Animals I Have Known (1898) and Charles G.D. Roberts’s The Kindred of the Wild (1902) are acknowledged as establishing a distinct and new literary genre in Canada, the realistic animal story. Lucy Maud Montgomery’s Anne of Green Gables (1907) ascends to its inevitable prominence here because of its regional setting and its international reputation, while other works are cited primarily for their significance in exploring genres and sub-genres new to Canadian children’s books. Under this general rubric, the authors include Grey Owl’s TheAdventures ofSajo and Her Beaver People (1935; a story incorporating respect for nature), Roderick Haig-Brown’s Starbuck Valley Winter (1943; a formulaic wilderness adventure), Catherine Anthony Clark’s The Golden Pine Cone (1950; a fantasy) and two works by Farley Mowat, Lost in the Barrens (1956; an Arctic survival story) and The Dog Who Wouldn’t Be (1957; a comic animal/people tale).The authors credit the 1967 Centennial celebrations in Canada as the catalyst that stimulated the publishing of works for Canadian children. Three significant events from 1967 are noted as critical in the development of children’s literature in Canada; namely, the publication of Sheila Egoff’s ground-breaking his­ tory of Canadian children’s books, The Republic of Childhood: A Critical Guide to Children’s Literature in English; the appearance of the first issue 262 j Gellert o f In Review, a jou rn al focusing on C an ad ian ch ild ren ’s books and their au th ors; and the fou n d in g o f T undra B o o k s, the first sm all p u blish in g house devoted to C an ad ian children’s books as artistic creations. These three initiatives, argue Jones and Stott, signal the m aturity o f C anadian ch ildren ’s literature, and the authors advance a con vin cin g corroboration o f this thesis as they turn their discussion to the proliferation o f p u blica­ tions, initiatives and program s w hich both supported children’s literature in C anada, and reflected its status. The common element in a variety of areas linked to Canadian children’s literature in the immediate post-1967 years is that they, in one way or another, helped change the landscape for works for children in Canada. The publication of Dennis Lees Alligator Pie (1974), proved that a substan­ tial market existed for Canadian children’s books. Initiatives such as the founding of the academic journal, Canadian Children’s Literature (1975); the establishment of the Canadian Children’s Book Centre (1976); the initiation of the Canadian Book Publishing Development Program (1976); programs sponsored by the Canada Council and provincial agencies pro­ viding grants to publishers and writers in the field—all were significant in...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0110.017
Science and technology studies0.0130.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0700.035

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicThemes in Literature AnalysisFrench-language works237,207