MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2597962781 · doi:10.19094/contextus.v7i1.32104

OPORTUNIDADES PARA COMPRAS VERDES NO SETOR DE SUPRIMENTOS DA PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A

2008· article· pt· W2597962781 on OpenAlexaff
Antônio Costa Silva Júnior, José Celio Silveira Andrade, Andréa Cardoso Ventura, Thais Cairo

Bibliographic record

VenueContextus - Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão · 2008
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBusiness and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este artigo aborda a oportunidade de introdução de conceitosde compras verdes nos processos de compras de bens emateriais da Petrobras S.A; tomando como base para osestudos o setor de Suprimentos da Regional Norte e Nordeste.Dessa forma, os processos de compras contemplariamtambém aspectos de ecoeficiência, utilizando o poder decompra como elemento de contribuição para práticas deresponsabilidade ambiental. Para isto, o procedimentometodológico aplicado para garantir os dados necessáriosfocou os pontos abordados no referencial teórico da pesquisae no entendimento e desenvolvimento dos estágios deimplementação da norma canadense CSA Z766-95. Assim,com os resultados quantitativos e qualitativos do desenvolvimentodo roteiro de implementação da norma supracitada,foi desenvolvida e validada uma estratégia de compras verdescom base na criação de contratos globais de fornecimento deprodutos ambientalmente amigáveis previamente selecionados,contribuindo para indução de comportamentoambientalmente responsável por parte dos seus fornecedores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueContextus - Revista Contemporânea de Economia e GestãoSame topicBusiness and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207