MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2598185245 · doi:10.3138/jcfs.41.5.783

Non-market Returns to Women Education in Sudan: Case of Fertility

2010· article· en· W2598185245 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hanaa Mahmoud Sid Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Comparative Family Studies · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFertilityChild mortalityResidenceDemographyTotal fertility rateAffect (linguistics)SocioeconomicsPopulationEconomicsGeographyPsychologySociologyFamily planningResearch methodology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper uses households’ data from central region of Sudan to examine the factors, which affect fertility. Thus, it examined the effect of parental education, income, mother age, residence area together with the effect of the interaction between fertility and child mortality, on fertility. Child mortality is instrumented on community and environmental health services, which are used as identifiers in the two-stage least squares estimation of the fertility function. The results suggest that mother’s education, child mortality, and mother’s age are important factors in determining the fertility level. Mother’s education, particularly university education, is found to have a significant negative impact on fertility, whereas child mortality and mother’s age have significant positive impact on fertility. The results of the two-stage least squares method are almost identical to those of the ordinary least squares method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Comparative Family StudiesSame topicGlobal Maternal and Child HealthFrench-language works237,207