MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2598217660 · doi:10.1155/2017/4682409

Optimal Cost‐Effective Maintenance Policy for a Helicopter Gearbox Early Fault Detection under Varying Load

2017· article· en· W2598217660 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xin Li, Jing Cai, Hongfu Zuo, Huaiyuan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Problems in Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReliability and Maintenance Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Graduate EducationUniversity of TorontoFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaGraduate Research and Innovation Projects of Jiangsu ProvinceChina Scholarship Council
KeywordsUnobservableControl limitsBayesian probabilityMultivariate statisticsFault (geology)Fault detection and isolationHidden Markov modelControl chartEngineeringHidden semi-Markov modelComputer scienceOptimal maintenanceMarkov chainPartially observable Markov decision processMinificationMathematical optimizationReliability engineeringMarkov modelProcess (computing)Artificial intelligenceEconometricsMachine learningVariable-order Markov modelMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most of the existing fault detection methods rarely consider the cost‐optimal maintenance policy. A novel multivariate Bayesian control approach is proposed, which enables the implementation of early fault detection for a helicopter gearbox with cost minimization maintenance policy under varying load. A continuous time hidden semi‐Markov model (HSMM) is employed to describe the stochastic relationship between the unobservable states and observable observations of the gear system. Explicit expressions for the remaining useful life prediction are derived using HSMM. Considering the maintenance cost in fault detection, the multivariate Bayesian control scheme based on HSMM is developed; the objective is to minimize the long‐run expected average cost per unit time. An effective computational algorithm in the semi‐Markov decision process (SMDP) framework is designed to obtain the optimal control limit. A comparison with the multivariate Bayesian control chart based on hidden Markov model (HMM) and the traditional age‐based replacement policy is given, which illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Problems in EngineeringSame topicReliability and Maintenance OptimizationFrench-language works237,207