MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2598257288 · doi:10.1149/ma2017-01/30/1408

Nickel-Based Amorphous Alloys As Electrocatalyst Materials in Alkaline Water Electrolysis

2017· article· en· W2598257288 on OpenAlexaff
Samy Ghobrial, Donald W. Kirk, Steven J. Thorpe

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrocatalystElectrolysisMaterials scienceAmorphous solidElectrolysis of waterChemical engineeringElectrochemistryNickelElectrolyteAlkaline water electrolysisAlloyAmorphous metalMetallurgyWater splittingInorganic chemistryCatalysisElectrodeChemistryOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Alkaline electrolysis with anionic exchange membranes has been shown to be a highly promising technology to produce hydrogen gas. This zero gap system does not require a liquid electrolyte and can utilize non-precious metal electrocatalyst materials. As such, it is possible to produce a low cost and energy efficient water electrolyzer [1]. Production of hydrogen gas from water electrolysis has been largely limited due to a lack of inexpensive and active electrocatalyst materials that do not degrade over time. Amorphous alloys have previously been proposed as electrocatalyst materials due to their unique atomic structure, which offer high corrosion resistance, high number of coordinatively unsaturated sites and electrochemical activity [2]. Their full potential has not been recognized as electrocatalysts largely due to their low surface area when produced and challenges in synthesis [2]. We suggest a novel process to produce high surface area amorphous alloy powders designed specifically as electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. This research is focused on Ni-based alloys that show high stability in alkaline solutions and high activity among non-platinum group metals [3]. Specifically, Ni-based alloys containing Nb and Y are studied in this work. Previous work has shown that Ni-Nb-Y amorphous alloys can phase separate into two distinct amorphous phases [4]. Further enhancement of the electrochemically active surface area can be achieved by selectively dealloying one of the two-phases leaving a nano-porous structure [5]. The present work assesses the electrochemical behaviour of these phase-separated Ni-Nb-Y amorphous alloys. Experimental Methods Ni-Nb-Y powder is produced by mechanically alloying high purity elemental powders using a high-energy ball mill. These powders are then chemically etched to selectively dealloy one of the two phases present. These powders can then be pressed into a pellet or mixed into ink and applied (by spraying, printing or brushing) onto a conductive support like carbon paper or glassy carbon rod [1]. Electrochemical characterization is assessed through steady state polarization (Tafel) curves, cyclic voltammetry, and AC impedance spectroscopy. Structural characterization is assessed through x-ray diffraction (XRD) and electron microscopy. Results and Discussion Mechanical alloying of nickel, niobium and yttrium elemental powders was performed, producing Ni58.2-Nb20.25Y21.25with ca 90% amorphous structure. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and XRD were used to analyze this alloy (see figure 1). SEM allowed analysis of particle size and morphology (average particle size is approximately 40 micron), and XRD allowed determination of microstructure, alloy formation and degree of crystallinity. The alloy produced a Ni-Nb-Y amorphous phase and a separate Ni-Y amorphous phase, indicating the presence of a phase separated alloy. The synthesized material also contains yttrium oxide, which is believed to reduce electrocatalytic activity [5]. Oxide formation can be limited by reducing exposure of the elemental powders to oxygen during the ball milling processing. Conclusions and Future Work The results suggest that high surface area amorphous Ni58.2-Nb20.25Y21.25 powder can be produced from high-energy ball milling. Future work will be further developing material to achieve fully amorphous structure, characterizing phase separation and evaluating electrochemical properties. [1] D. Pletcher, and X. Li. “Prospects for alkaline zero gap water electrolyzers for hydrogen production.” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 36, pp. 15089-15104, (2011) [2] F. Safizadeh, E. Ghali, and G. Houlachi. “Electrocatalysis developments for hydrogen evolution reaction in alkaline solutions – A Review”. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 40, pp. 256-274, (2015) [3] K. Zeng, and D. Zhang. “Recent progress in alkaline water electrolysis for hydrogen production and applications.” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, vol. 36, pp. 307-326, (2010) [4] N. Mattern, T. Gemming, J. Thomas, G. Goerigk, H. Franz, and J. Eckert. “Phase Separation in Ni-Nb-Y metallic glasses.” Journal of Alloys and Compounds, vol. 495, pp. 299-304, (2010) [5] A. Gerbert, N. Mattern, U. Kuhn, J. Eckert and L. Schultz. “Electrode characteristics of two-phase glass-forming Ni-Nb-Y alloys.” Intermetallics, vol. 15, pp. 1183-1189, (2007) Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting Abstracts→Same topicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion→French-language works237,207→