La clarté comme principe directeur dans le discours normatif sur les usages communicationnels en presse écrite québécoise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les journalistes de la presse crite quotidienne sont obligs d'crire leurs articles de manire ce qu'ils soient facilement comprhensibles par le plus grand nombre de lecteurs possible. cette fin, la valeur de clart est souvent prsente comme un principe rdactionnel important qui devrait assurer l'accessibilit de l'criture journalistique. Dans cette optique, nous nous intresserons aux conceptions de la langue que les professionnels des mdias crits qubcois attribuent la notion de clart, idologie linguistique qui traverse le discours sur la langue franaise depuis plusieurs sicles. Nous traiterons cet aspect partir d'un corpus d'entretiens semi-dirigs raliss auprs de seize enseignants d'criture journalistique et de douze chroniqueurs. Nous analyserons dans quelle mesure les propos des tmoins correspondent au discours normatif vhicul dans les manuels de journalisme qubcois.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".