MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2598344722 · doi:10.1111/ddi.12543

Ecological niche differentiation across a wolf‐coyote hybrid zone in eastern North America

2017· article· en· W2598344722 on OpenAlexafffund
Josée‐Anne Otis, Dan Thornton, Linda Y. Rutledge, Dennis L. Murray

Bibliographic record

VenueDiversity and Distributions · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsTrent University
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsNicheEcological nicheEcologyEnvironmental niche modellingHybridNiche segregationBiologyNiche differentiationRange (aeronautics)Niche constructionHabitatEcosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aim Human‐caused habitat alteration and disturbance have promoted widespread loss of species’ reproductive barriers, leading to hybridization and attendant changes in the distribution, abundance and interactions of most species. In theory, hybrids should have intermediate niche occupancy features compared to parental groups, thereby potentially leading to fundamental changes in the role of organisms in an ecosystem. Yet, there is a gap in our empirical understanding of how hybrids differ in their niche characteristics compared to parental types; this uncertainty is especially true for large carnivores that range over large spatial extents and have high behavioural plasticity in their niche characteristics or in the environments that they inhabit. We sought to test whether eastern wolf ( Canis lycaon ) – eastern coyote ( C. latrans sp .) hybrids exhibited intermediate environmental niche characteristics compared to their progenitors. Location Eastern North America. Methods We integrated genetic profiling of georeferenced canid (eastern wolf, eastern coyote, hybrid) samples into species distribution models, to investigate relationships between canid genetic groups and their environment. We used relevant environmental variables to investigate niche overlap and niche breath of hybrids and their parental groups. Results Species distribution models revealed clear patterns of niche differentiation, with hybrids tending to occur in areas having intermediate environmental niche attributes and niche breadth, compared to parental groups. Niche overlap between hybrids and either parental group was greater than between the two parental groups, further highlighting the intermediate environmental niche that is occupied by hybrids. Main conclusions We show that even among wide‐ranging and highly plastic large carnivores, hybrids tend to exhibit intermediate niche characteristics compared to parental groups. Our support for the intermediate phenotype hypothesis highlights its ecological relevance even when faced with coarse observational data, complex genetic structure, large spatial scale and high phenotypic plasticity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiversity and DistributionsSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207