EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF ANESTHESIA ON CEREBRAL OXYGENATION AND COGNITIVE FUNCTIONS IN CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can be followed by postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Goal of the study: to investigate the effect of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and inhalation anesthesia (IA) with sevoflurane on cerebral oxygenation and POCD. Materials and methods. 40 patients were enrolled into the study and divided into the groups of TIVA and IA. The cerebral tissue oxygen saturation with oxygen (SctO2) was recorded during CEA and in 24 hours after it. Cognitive functions were assessed with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) before the CEA, in 1 and 5 days after. Results. Reduction of SctO 2 was observed on the operated side after carotid clamping. SctO 2 transitory reduced on the contralateral side in the TIVA group and was significantly higher in the IA group. MoCA changes in 24 hours after the surgery correlated with SctO 2 reduction on the ipsilateral side in TIVA group (rho = 0.54; p = 0.015). In 5 days after CEA, the cognitive functions were higher in the IA group (p = 0.028). Conclusion. Anesthesia with sevoflurane used for CEA may mitigate an asymmetry of cerebral perfusion, improves oxygenation of contralateral hemisphere and reduces the risk of POCD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".