Three year results of a prospective study on focal salvage HDR prostate brachytherapy for local recurrence after external beam radiotherapy (XRT).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e558 Background: Salvage options for those with local recurrence after XRT include surgery, brachytherapy, cryotherapy or high-frequency ultrasound. However, the risk of significant complications (e.g. fistula, incontinence, bladder neck contracture), is not insignificant. The sensitivity of multiparametric MRI in detecting viable cancer within the prostate is now more than 70%. The objectives of this pilot study are to explore the toxicities, QOL and efficacy of focal salvage HDR brachytherapy in patients with MRI-visible biopsy-confirmed local recurrence. Methods: Eligible patients included: multiparametric 3T MRI-visible biopsy-confirmed local recurrence > 30 months after XRT, negative metastatic workup, IPSS < 15, post-XRT PSA < 10ng/mL, prostate volume ≤ 50cc. The ultrasound-based HDR brachytherapy prescription dose was 27Gy divided over two implants separated by 1 week to the target volume (TV) with dose constraints to the urethra and rectum. Follow-up PSA, IPSS, EPIC QOL and CTCAE v4.0 toxicities were collected. Results: 15 patients (mean age 73 years) were enrolled in the study. Median follow up was 30 months (12-42). At initial presentation, there were 5, 8 and 2 low-, intermediate- and high-risk disease, and initial XRT dose was 70-78Gy. The Gleason score of the local recurrence was 6, 7 and 8-10 in 1, 7 and 6, respectively, and not classified in 1 patient. The pre-HDR median PSA was 4.13 (1.30 – 9.29). The median size of the recurrence on MRI was 9mm (7-20), TV 6.1cc (2.2-16.1), TV V100 96.3%, TV D90 110.9%, urethral D10 64.5% and rectal D10 36.0%. No acute/late GU/GI grade 3-5 toxicities, nor urinary retention, were observed. The most common acute toxicity was frequency and nocturia. Median IPSS at baseline, 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, 24-months was 4, 8, 5, 5, 8 and 5 (p = 0.72). Three year PSA failure free rate was 71%. There was no significant change in EPIC domains. Conclusions: Early toxicity, QOL and PSA failure-freedata suggests that focal salvage HDR brachytherapy is well tolerated and effective. Clinical trial information: NCT01583920.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".