MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2598583637

Viewing Education in Canada through an Intersectional Auto-Ethnographic Lens

2016· article· en· W2598583637 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial alternatives · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDiscourse Analysis in Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOralityOral traditionSymbol (formal)FolkloreLiteratureStorytellingSociologyOral literaturePower (physics)PraiseTricksterMythologyHistoryNarrativeAestheticsAnthropologyLinguisticsLiteracyArtPhilosophyPedagogy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Orality and Auto-ethnographySANKOFA: Adrinka symbol for the importance of learning from the past'At the bottom of patience, one finds heaven' ~ Ghanaian proverbAfricans believe in 'nommo ... the generative power of the spoken word' (Hamlet 1998: 91). Orality is not only a communication vehicle or a means to convey knowledge from generation to generation, but it is described by Maryam Nabavi as 'pedagogy that takes on many forms, including proverbs, praise-songs, storytelling, folklore, debates, poetry, fables, riddles, singing, myths and mythologies' (Nabavi 2006: 178). My people are from Ghana, West Africa. Ghanaians inherited from their ancestors a pictographic writing system called Adrinka, comprised of symbols often associated with a specific proverb rooted in the cultural experience. The Adrinka system of symbols acts to preserve and transmit the cultural values of our people, while proverbs constitute an important part of the Ghanaian oral tradition and their use is widespread as mini-stories conveying cultural wisdom, values and expectations. This rich oral and symbolic literary tradition has been core to the survival of my culture, its people and its community. Prefacing each section of this article is a symbol and proverb, which communicate an aspect of the themes discussed in that section.As a member of the African Diaspora, narrative processes resonate with me - I was raised relying on and celebrating oral forms of expression. Drawing on and telling my oral history was a way of 'finding voice against historical misrepresentations, and seeking empowerment' (Nabavi 2006: 179). Oral histories were popularised and theorised during the feminist movement to bring voice to the experiences of women 'in a culture that has traditionally relied on masculine interpretation' (Fontana and Frey 2005: 709). Today, narrative and autoethnographic approaches have emerged as ways to give voice to marginalised researchers and participants while providing communities with a deeper understanding of the meaning of these experiences (Williams et al. 2005).Auto-ethnographic and phenomenological methods of inquiry were employed in my study to uncover a deeper understanding and meaning of my experiences. With auto-ethnography, I placed myself at the centre of the research, emphasising reflexivity while stimulating deeper understanding and uncovering new meaning and appreciation of social and cultural dynamics (Ellis and Bochner 1996). It is a method of inquiry that connects 'the personal to the cultural' (Ellis and Bochner 2000: 740) and uses 'personal text as critical intervention in social, political and cultural life' (Jones 2005: 763). The auto-ethnographic method allowed me to remain true to an integrated view of myself where the 'self as researcher and the lived self are not separate' (Richardson 2000: 923-948). Audre Lorde said it best: 'If I didn't define myself for myself, I would be crunched into other people's fantasies for me and eaten alive' (1984: 125). By studying my own marginalised identity and social location, the auto-ethnographic process facilitated my own resistance, transformation and liberation.NEA ONNIM NO SUA A, OHU: Andrinka symbol of knowledge and lifelong education'Knowledge is like a Baobab tree ... no one can encompass it with their hands' ~ Ghanaian proverbAmong the things that have always been important to Ghanaians is the value placed on education, knowledge acquisition and openness to learning, exemplified by the Adrinka symbol of knowledge, life-long education, and continued quest for knowledge and in the proverb: 'Knowledge is like a Baobab tree...no one can encompass it with their hands'. This fundamental value counters the racism inherent in characterisations of Black people as uninterested in and incapable of contributing to knowledge generation, learning and education.Canadian society and, by extension, its educational institutions have been shaped by Western European, Christian and Anglo-Saxon traditions, and their colonial, patriarchal and racist legacies continue to steep and affect the experiences of multiply marginalised Black individuals and students (Kobayashi and Johnson 2007: 3-16; Taylor et al. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it