MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W259864410

Frequency and type of food safety infractions in food establishments with and without certified food handlers.

2009· article· en· W259864410 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sara P. Noble, Mansel W. Griffiths, Sylvanus Thompson, Tanya MacLaurin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Safety and Hygiene
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCertificationFood safetyFood serviceEnvironmental healthBusinessFood preparationMedicineMarketingManagement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A peer-reviewed article North Americans consume food from food service establishments frequently; therefore, restaurants may be a significant source of foodborne illness. Food Handler Certification provides food handlers with knowledge to control factors that may contribute to foodborne illnesses. Food Handler Certification is mandatory in a number of provinces in Canada as well as several states in the United States. This study compared two groups of food establishments, one with mandatory Food Handler Certification for staff and management and one without. Establishments in which Food Handler Certification was mandatory were 1.97 times less likely to receive infractions during inspections (P = < 0.0000001; OR: 1.97, 95 % C.L: 1.54–2.50). The types of infractions commonly noted during inspections between the two study groups were similar, but the mandatory Food Handler Certification group had fewer infractions noted during inspections in almost all of the infraction categories, indicating that Food Handler Certification should be implemented in all food establishments because it has a positive effect on inspection scores. Further research comparing food service establishments with mandatory Food Handler

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFood Safety and HygieneFrench-language works237,207