MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) after platinum-based chemotherapy (CHEM): A multicenter study of North American testicular cancer survivors (TCS).

2017· article· en· W2598812260 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Issam Abu Zaid, Wambui G. Gathirua‐Mwangi, AnnaLynn M. Williams, Chunkit Fung, Patrick O. Monahan, Darren R. Feldman, Robert J. Hamilton, David J. Vaughn, Clair J. Beard, Ryan Cook, Sandra K. Althouse, Omar El Charif, Howard D. Sesso, Shirin Ardeshir‐Rouhani‐Fard, Lawrence H. Einhorn, Sophie D. Fosså, Lois B. Travis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMetabolic syndromeInternal medicineAbdominal obesityWaistObesityCancerEndocrinologyGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

102 Background: Testicular cancer has an excellent prognosis since the introduction of platinum-based CHEM. However, several European studies report an excess of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in TCS. MetS is a cluster of cardiovascular risk factors that doubles CVD risk, with several European series noting a prevalence ranging from 13-39% in TCS. In the first large multi-center North American study of TCS, we examine the prevalence of and potential risk factors for MetS after modern CHEM (NCI R01 CA157823). Methods: Eligible TCS were <50 y at diagnosis and treated with only first line CHEM after 1990. TCS underwent physical exams, completed questionnaires regarding co-morbidities and health behaviors and had lipid panels, testosterone, and serum soluble cell adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) measured. A single nucleotide polymorphism, rs523349 (V89L), in 5-α-reductase gene ( SRD5A2) previously suggested to associate with MetS in TCS was genotyped. MetS was defined as ≥3 of the following: hypertension (HTN), waist circumference ≥102 cm, triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL, HDL ≤40 mg/dL, and diabetes (Alberti et al, Circulation 2009). Controls (1:1) derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were matched on age, race, and educational status. Results: We evaluated 486 consecutively enrolled TCS. Median age at evaluation was 38 y (range: 19-68). TCS had higher prevalence of HTN compared to controls (43% vs 31%, P < .01) but lower prevalence of low HDL (24% vs 35%, P < .01) and abdominal obesity (28% vs 40%, P < .01). Prevalence of MetS was comparable (21% TCS; 22% controls, P = .59). In multivariate analysis, age at evaluation (P < .01), serum testosterone <3.0 ng/mL (OR = 2.0, P = .005), and elevated sICAM-1 (OR for quartiles 2, 3, 4 vs lowest quartile: 2.7 (P = .01), 3.1 (P < .01), and 3.6 (P < .01), respectively) significantly correlated with MetS. The variant rs523349 (VL/LL) did not associate with MetS. Conclusions: One in 5 TCS treated with CHEM developed MetS. Providers should screen for MetS, adequately treat hypogonadism, HTN and hyperlipidemia, and encourage TCS to maintain a healthy lifestyle. Significant elevations in sICAM-1 underscore a role for inflammation in MetS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207