MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Long-term survival of patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) treated with dacarbazine (DTIC) or temozolomide (TMZ)

2009· article· en· W2598875489 on OpenAlexaff
C. Kim, C. W. Lee, Richard Klasa, Aditya Shah, Kerry J. Savage

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMelanoma and MAPK Pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDacarbazineMedicineTemozolomideInternal medicineChemotherapyMelanomaOncologyCancerSurgeryGastroenterologyCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

9054 Background: Patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) generally have a poor prognosis, with a median survival of 6 to 9 months. There is a small proportion of patients who achieve long term survival (LTS), however, it is unclear whether LTS reflects sensitivity to systemic therapy, indolent tumor biology or host immune factors. Dacarbazine (DTIC) is the only approved chemotherapy for the treatment of MM, although temozolomide (TMZ) has similar efficacy. There is limited information as to the frequency of complete response (CR) following DTIC or TMZ, duration of response and whether LTS occurs only in patients who achieve a CR. We sought to identify all patients with MM treated with either DTIC (alone or in combinations) or TMZ at the BC Cancer Agency (BCCA) who achieved LTS defined as survival ≥ 18 months from the time of administration of chemotherapy. Methods: All patients with MM treated with either DTIC or TMZ from January 1, 1988 to February 1, 2006 were identified in the BCCA pharmacy database. The BCCA surveillance and outcomes unit (SAO) was utilized to identify cases of LTS. CR was defined as disappearance of all disease by diagnostic imaging. Given the retrospective nature of the analysis, progressive disease (PD) was defined as any tumor growth, and partial response or stable disease (PR/SD) were combined. Results: In the 18-year period reviewed, 397 patients with MM were treated with DTIC (n= 349) or TMZ (n=48). Of these, 45 patients met the criterion of LTS and had the following characteristics: median age 53 (range 22–86); male 67 %; ocular primary 7%; non-pulmonary visceral metastases 38%; DTIC 11.7% (41/349), TMZ 8.3% (4/48). The best response to DTIC or TMZ documented was: CR 18%, PR/SD 67%, PD 13%. The 5-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 33% and 12%, respectively. Eleven patients survived > 5 years (range 5–27.5), and 6 patients remain in remission (5 CR, 1 PR). Disease progression occurred in 5 patients in < 1 year however, they remain alive for at least 5 years (range 5.2–17.9). Conclusions: LTS occurs in patients with MM treated with either DTIC or TMZ. However, a minority have a sustained response following chemotherapy, and most cases of LTS are likely the result of indolent disease or host biology. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysFrench-language works237,207