MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2599001069 · doi:10.19181/snsp.2017.5.1.4991

Dynamics of Three-Dimensional Model {g} Family Orientation (Samples 1976-2000-2014)

2017· article· en· W2599001069 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aleksander V. Zhavorokov

Bibliographic record

VenueSociologicheskaja nauka i social naja praktika · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSocioeconomic and Demographic Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNormativeDynamics (music)PopulationOrientation (vector space)PsychologyQuarter (Canadian coin)Social psychologyDevelopmental psychologyDemographySociologyMathematicsGeographyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article reveals the volume of relationship of behavioral and normative orientations of women in the dynamics over forty years. A secondary analysis was undertaken with deep processing of primary data. The author analyzes test results with the help of semantic differential, methods to identify life orientations and opinions on three measurements at intervals of 25 and 15 years. The analysis result is the construction of normative behavioral and orientation model, characteristics of which are related to the fundamental demographic parameters, necessary for the process of population reproduction. A stable orientation of married women with a one- or two-child family was revealed, which was formed in Russian society toward the last quarter of the 20th century. The article also presents a problem of insufficiency of economic half measures to get out of the demographic crisis and the necessity of systemic measures to overcome this situation in order to ensure further normal development of the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.195
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociologicheskaja nauka i social naja praktikaSame topicSocioeconomic and Demographic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207