MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2599007259 · doi:10.1093/jpids/pix013

Four Component Meningococcal Capsular Group B Vaccine in Preterm Infants

2017· article· en· W2599007259 on OpenAlexaff
Manish Sadarangani, Sheula Barlow, Mark Anthony, Andrew J. Pollard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of Oxford
KeywordsMedicineGroup BMeningococcal vaccineGroup AComponent (thermodynamics)Neisseria meningitidisPediatricsVirologyImmunologyInternal medicineImmunizationAntibodyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor—The four component meningococcal capsular group B vaccine (4CMenB) was introduced into the routine immunization schedule in the United Kingdom in September 2015 to protect against group B Neisseria meningitidis meningitis and septicemia. The vaccine is reactogenic in young infants, causing fever in 51% to 65% when coadministered with other vaccines [1, 2]. This finding led to the unprecedented recommendation that all infants be given prophylactic paracetamol (acetaminophen) with the vaccine. Preterm infants are immunized at the same chronological age and on the same schedule as are term infants, but they have higher rates of postimmunization adverse events (AEs), particularly infants born at <28 weeks’ gestation who are hospitalized in a neonatal unit when immunized [3]. Preterm infants were excluded from 4CMenB vaccine prelicensure trials, and no such trials have been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (as of October 14, 2016). The administration of a reactogenic vaccine in this population has led to heightened concern about AEs, which might affect use of the vaccine in very preterm infants until they are discharged home and delay protection of this vulnerable group against meningococcal disease. For a study of rotavirus vaccine (RotaNeo) in hospitalized preterm infants, we recruited infants before and after introduction of the 4CMenB vaccine in the United Kingdom (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02252029), which provided a unique opportunity for us to compare preterm infants who did and those who did not receive the 4CMenB vaccine. The primary study objective was to establish the duration of fecal rotavirus vaccine excretion after immunization. Solicited and unsolicited AE reports were recorded from parents, nursing staff, and medical records contemporaneously up to 7 days after immunization. Sixty-four postimmunization data points were collected for each participant; we had no missing data. Of 17 infants who completed the study, 8 received the 4CMenB vaccine, and 9 did not; all of them received other routine immunizations. The overall mean gestational age at birth was 27.1 weeks (range, 24.0–29.6 weeks), and their mean age at immunization was 9.5 weeks; we found no differences between the infants who did and those who did not receive the 4CMenB vaccine (Table 1). Only 3 infants who were given the 4CMenB vaccine received paracetamol. Of the 5 who did not, 1 had a postimmunization fever and 3 had a low temperature in the 2 days after immunization. None of the infants who did not receive the 4CMenB vaccine had temperature instability. Overall, 4CMenB vaccine recipients were significantly more likely to have any temperature instability (50% vs 0%; P = .029). Decreased feeding and reduced activity were more common in the 4CMenB group, whereas irritability and crying occurred more frequently in the infants who did not receive the 4CMenB vaccine (Table 1), which might be attributable in part to the use of paracetamol in some of the 4CMenB vaccine recipients. Demographics and Rates of Postimmunization AEs in Infants Who Did and Those Who Did Not Receive 4CMenB Vaccine up to 2 and 7 Days After Immunization Abbreviation: 4CMenB, four component meningococcal capsular group B; AE, adverse event; GA, gestational age at birth; NA, not applicable; SD, standard deviation. Comparison of the 4CMenB versus non-4CMenB groups was performed using Fisher’s exact test. Bold type indicates a significant result (P < .05). One AE was classified as severe (day 1 after immunization). One AE was classified as severe (day of immunization). Three AEs were classified as severe (all on day 1 after immunization). Apnea, bradycardia, and desaturation. Apnea and desaturation in 1 infant and desaturation only in 3 infants. Event on day 7 after immunization required reintubation. Demographics and Rates of Postimmunization AEs in Infants Who Did and Those Who Did Not Receive 4CMenB Vaccine up to 2 and 7 Days After Immunization Abbreviation: 4CMenB, four component meningococcal capsular group B; AE, adverse event; GA, gestational age at birth; NA, not applicable; SD, standard deviation. Comparison of the 4CMenB versus non-4CMenB groups was performed using Fisher’s exact test. Bold type indicates a significant result (P < .05). One AE was classified as severe (day 1 after immunization). One AE was classified as severe (day of immunization). Three AEs were classified as severe (all on day 1 after immunization). Apnea, bradycardia, and desaturation. Apnea and desaturation in 1 infant and desaturation only in 3 infants. Event on day 7 after immunization required reintubation. This study has provided the first data on AEs in hospitalized preterm infants after being given the 4CMenB vaccine, and our results suggest an increase in some AEs with the 4CMenB vaccine, most notably temperature instability. Larger studies (with ~70 infants per group for 90% power with a 5% α value based on these data) are needed to inform guidance for monitoring postimmunization AEs in these infants and the use of prophylactic paracetamol, because low temperature was more common than fever. Disclaimer. The views presented in this article do not necessarily represent the views of the UK Department of Health or the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization. Financial support. The RotaNeo study was funded by a grant awarded to M. S. by the University of Oxford Medical Research Fund (grant MRF/MT2013/2066). Potential conflicts of interest. M. S. has been an investigator on investigator-initiated research studies funded by Pfizer. A. J. P. is a Jenner Investigator and James Martin Senior Fellow and previously conducted research on behalf of Oxford University funded by vaccine manufacturers. M. S. and A. J. P. have not received any personal remuneration from vaccine manufacturers. A. J. P. is chair of the UK Department of Health’s (DH) Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI). The other authors report no conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases SocietySame topicBacterial Infections and VaccinesFrench-language works237,207