MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2599100586

Seminars in Applied Research Methods

2013· article· en· W2599100586 on OpenAlexaff
Nisha Malhotra

Bibliographic record

VenueSyllabus · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovations in Educational Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConceptualizationPresentation (obstetrics)Argument (complex analysis)Research methodologyPopulationEmpirical researchManagement sciencePsychologyEngineering ethicsComputer scienceSociologyEpistemologyMedicineEngineeringArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The course provides students with an opportunity to undertake a major research project and to present the findings as an oral presentation and in a written paper. Fundamentally, students learn how to present an effective economic argument, through researching a topic related to gender, population, or health, and are required to write individual research papers. The course emphasizes conceptualization, modeling, and empirical skills that are widely used in economic analyses, and which must be applied to research data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.053
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.073
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0530.073
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0030.008
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1370.063

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.192
GPT teacher head0.597
Teacher spread0.405 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSyllabusSame topicInnovations in Educational MethodsFrench-language works237,207