MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2599135260 · doi:10.5539/ass.v13n4p147

Business Coevolution: Considerations from the Mobile Telecommunication Sector in Latin America Economy

2017· article· en· W2599135260 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sergio-Andrés Pulgarín

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMainstreamTransformational leadershipLatin AmericansSpace (punctuation)BusinessCoevolutionInvestment (military)PhenomenonCorporate groupMarketingIndustrial organizationEconomic geographyTelecommunicationsEconomicsManagementPolitical scienceFinanceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamic and interaction between companies and the environment leads to atypical emergences addressed by the strategic business direction mainstream. In this document the introduction of CoEvolutionary Relationships is presented to explain how some groups of companies that are facing business turbulence, not only survive, but grow rapidly in an internal dynamic space and transformational environment, becoming an attractive investment option. To explain this phenomenon, the field of mobile telecommunications in Colombia is studied, applying a mixed methodology that includes semi-structured interviews and the analysis of documentary content (ADC). The findings reflect a structural link between a turbulent environment and a group of companies that developed growth in their sector despite the turmoil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicInnovation and Knowledge ManagementFrench-language works237,207