Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé | En 2016 le mouvement « Nuit debout » a pris possession de l’espace public dans de nombreuses villes françaises. Loin de la colonisation par la lumière et le marché, loin du repli sécuritaire ou du marketing événementiel des « Nuits blanches », la mobilisation a notamment permis de redécouvrir les dimensions politiques et humaines essentielles de la nuit. Une première approche systémique et « chronotopique » permet de questionner la visualité et l’invisibilité, de s’interroger sur le régime d’intermittence de cette « scène » nocturne, sur l’organisation et sur les formes de ces agencements temporaires connectés et sur l’intensité de ces « hypertopes », ces lieux « augmentés » par l’intensité des échanges – en face à face et à distance – et l’expérimentation in situ. Ici et ailleurs, ces appropriations (ré)inventent un espace public du faire, comme autant de « lucioles » dans la « multitude » et d’occasions “d’exister la ville.”Abstract | In 2016, the « Nuit débout » movement took over public space in numerous French towns and cities. Rather than representing the colonization of night by light and commerce, and lacking the controlled security or event-marketing of “Nuit blanche”, these demonstrations quite remarkably allowed for a rediscovery of the essential human and political dimensions of the night. Through an approach both systemic and “chronotopic” we examine the visuality and invisibility of this night-time “scene,” with attention to its regime of intermittence, its organization, the forms of temporary and connected agencies involved, and the intensity of its “hypertopes”, those places enhanced by the intensity of exchanges (both face to face and over distances) and by in situ experimentation. Here and elsewhere, these appropriations (re)invent a public space of action, like so many “fireflies” amidst the multitude and as occasions in which the city assumes its existence.Luc Gwiazdzinkski is a geographer at the Université Grenoble-Alpes. He has been Director of the Institut de géographie Alpine (IGA) and currently directs the Master program in “Innovation et territoire. Créativité et design des politiques publiques” (www/masteriter.fr). He is founding President of the Pôle des arts urbains. A researcher at the Pacte laboratory (UMR 5194 CNRS), he pursues research on mobility, municipal innovation and what he has termed chrono-urbanism. His published works include L’hybridation des mondes (2016); Les ateliers de l’imaginaire (2015); Urbi et Orbi (2010); La fin des maires (2008); Nuits d’Europe (2007); Périphéries (2007); La nuit dernière frontière de la ville (2005); Si la ville m’était contée (2005); La nuit en questions (editor; 2005); and La ville 24/24 (2003).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.213 | 0.052 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".