Bibliographic record
Abstract
Développé au 18 ème siècle en Grande-Bretagne et présent aujourd’hui dans l’ensemble des pays occidentaux, le néo-druidisme est une vaste mouvance dont l’objet central est la restauration de l’ancienne religion des peuples celtes. Pour ses pratiquants, les druidisants et les druidisantes, il s’agit de remettre au goût du jour les croyances et les rituels des druides de l’Antiquité, perçus comme les personnages centraux de cet ancien système religieux. Néanmoins, si les divinités et le calendrier liturgique celtiques ont fait l’objet d’attentives réhabilitations, une pratique rituelle antique est, elle, sujette à de vives condamnations de nos jours : le sacrifice animal et humain. Les quelques sources anciennes concernant les druides mentionnent en effet que ces derniers immolaient lors de populaires rassemblements des offrandes animales et plus rarement des offrandes humaines. À partir des données ethnographiques issues d’une enquête de terrain au Québec, l’objet de cet article est ainsi d’analyser le processus de réinvention qu’a connu cette pratique rituelle, largement transformée pour être adaptée au contexte actuel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".