MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2599299976

Variable Neighborhood Search for Extremal Graphs. 22. Extending Bounds for Independence to Upper Irredundance

2007· article· en· W2599299976 on OpenAlexaff
Mustapha Aouchiche, Odile Favaron, Pierre Hansen

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers du GERAD · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsGroup for Research in Decision AnalysisHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsVertex (graph theory)Upper and lower boundsMathematicsMathematical proofIndependence numberGraphDiscrete mathematicsIndependent setIndependence (probability theory)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A set of vertices S in a graph G is independent if no neighbor of a vertex of S belongs to S. A set of vertices U in a graph G is irredundant if each vertex v of U has a private neighbor, which may be v itself, i.e., a neighbor of v which is not a neighbor of any other vertex of U. The independence number @a (resp. upper irredundance number IR) is the maximum number of vertices of an independent (resp. irredundant) set of G. In previous work, a series of best possible lower and upper bounds on @a and some other usual invariants of G were obtained by the system AGX 2, and proved either automatically or by hand. These results are strengthened in the present paper by systematically replacing @a by IR. The resulting conjectures were tested by AGX which could find no counter-example to an upper bound nor any case where a lower bound could not be shown to remain tight. Some proofs for the bounds on @a carry over. In all other cases, new proofs are provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers du GERADSame topicAdvanced Graph Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207