MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2599320309

Récit d’une dépossession / Le Torrent de Simon Lavoie, Québec, 2012, 150 min

2013· article· fr· W2599320309 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean‐François Hamel

Bibliographic record

VenueÉrudit (Université de Montréal) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCrime and Detective Fiction Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPossession (linguistics)Philosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anne Hébert, l'une des plus grandes écrivaines québécoises de la seconde moitié du XX e siècle, est l'auteure d'un œuvre varié qui s'échelonne sur plus de cinq décennies, composé de nouvelles, de romans, de pièces de théâtre, de poèmes et de scénarios.Pourtant, le cinéma n'a que peu puisé dans ce répertoire littéraire, malgré sa richesse et sa portée sociohistorique.Il y a bien l'exception de Kamou raska (1973) de Claude Jutra, adapté de sa fresque historique du même titre, dont elle a signé, avec le réalisateur, le scénario et les dialogues; puis, celle, moins mémorable, des Fous de Bassan (1986) d'Yves Simoneau, à partir du roman publié en 1982.Un quart de siècle plus tard, Simon Lavoie (Le Déserteur, 2008, et Laurentie, 2011) s'est lancé le défi, ou a peut-être ressenti la nécessité, de combler ce manque en adaptant, pour son troisième long métrage, la célèbre nouvelle d' Anne Hébert, originellement publiée en 1950, Le Torrent.Celle-ci appartient en outre à un recueil de nouvelles auquel elle donne son titre et qui avait alors permis à l'écrivaine de se positionner comme une figure de proue de la littérature québécoise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.173
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueÉrudit (Université de Montréal)Same topicCrime and Detective Fiction StudiesFrench-language works237,207