MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Frequency Control of Micro Grid with wind Perturbations Using Levy walks with Spider Monkey Optimization Algorithm

2017· article· en· W2599344532 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Renewable Energy Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFrequency Control in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpiderGridAlgorithmOptimization algorithmComputer scienceControl (management)Mathematical optimizationControl theory (sociology)MathematicsBiologyArtificial intelligenceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frequency and voltage controls are the two main challenges in the micro grid operation both in the grid connected and autonomous mode due to the presence of uncertain renewable sources. Since economic micro grid operation relies on fluctuating renewable sources such as wind and solar, the task of maintaining frequency within the limits for smooth operation of micro grid demands advanced controller action. Keeping this in mind, a panoptic exploration to search space has been accomplished using proposed eagle strategy for optimizing the gains of PI controller employed in controllable generating units in the islanded micro grid. The proposed eagle strategy which made the search process two fold i.e., coarse search by levy flights and an intensive local search by spider monkey algorithm. The proposed strategy has been tested on typical micro grid test system and also on real world Bella Coola micro grid in British Columbia, Canada. Frequency model of systems were developed in SIMULINK/MATLAB and the simulation results for different scenarios confirms that the proposed strategy performs better and the results are compared with few prominent algorithms to ascertain its superiority in finding better gains of PI controllers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Renewable Energy ResearchSame topicFrequency Control in Power SystemsFrench-language works237,207