MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2599389294 · doi:10.33137/rr.v36i2.20166

The Passion and Flagellation in Sixteenth-Century Japan

2013· article· fr· W2599389294 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Junhyoung Michael Shin

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassionHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article met en relation la pratique ascétique et pénitentielle de l’auto-flagellation par les tous premiers catholiques du Japon du XVIe siècle, avec leur compréhension de la passion du Christ telle qu’enseignée par les missionnaires Jésuites, et avec la tradition japonaise de l’ascétisme bouddhiste. On y montre que les pratiques dévalorisant les valeurs corporelles qui se trouvaient déjà dans les traditions religieuses japonaises, ont facilité la compréhension et la sympathie pour les pratiques comparables de la nouvelle religion européenne, malgré que les Jésuites leur aient présenté une théologie monothéiste inédite au Japon. Ces similitudes ont contribués à l’assimilation de la passion du Christ par les convertis japonais et à leur adoption de l’auto-flagellation rituelle, qui contraste vivement avec la mission contemporaine des Jésuites en Chine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicChinese history and philosophyFrench-language works237,207