Lifestyle Differences in Traditionalism and Modernity and Reasons for Divorce Among Muslim Palestinian Citizens of Israel
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study compared the various reasons for divorce endorsed by a large, heterogeneous sample of divorced male and female Muslim Palestinian citizens oflsrael who reported modem-traditional lifestyle differences as one of their reasons with the reasons of those who did not. The findings show that the divorced women who named these lifestyle differences as one of the reasons for their divorce reported significantly more other reasons for divorce as well. Significantly higher proportions of these women reported eleven out of the other I 7 reasons tapped in the study than their no lifestyle differences counterparts . Specifically, higher percentages of them reported incompatibility (both didn’t get along and communication problems); infidelity and lack of commitment (to the marriage and the family); mental illness and refusal to work; interference by the extended family (both daily and in the form of forcing the divorce); and verbal and sexual abuse. These findings seem to provide empirical evidence of the disruptive impact of moderntraditional lifestyle differences on the marital relationship of Muslim Palestinian citizens of Israel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it