SISTEM INFORMASI PENGOLAHAN DATA IONOSFER DALAM MENDUKUNG PELAYANAN DATA PADA BPD LAPAN PONTIANAK
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstrak – Pengamatan dibidang ionosfer, Balai Pengamatan Dirgantara LAPAN Pontianak memiliki peralatan pengamatan yang terdiri dari peralatan CADI ( Canadian Advanced Digital Ionosonde ) dan GISTM/TEC ( Ionospheric Scintillation and TEC Monitor ). Pada bagian pengolahan data ionosfer belum memiliki sistem informasi dalam pengelolaan data ionosfer, sehingga data tersebut dapat dimanfaatkan dan dikembangkan untuk kebutuhan yang berhubungan dengan lapisan ionosfer. Desain sistem penelitian ini menggunakan Data Flow Diagram dan Entity Relationship Diagram serta sistem pengujiannya mengunakan Black Box dan Borang yang kemudian dihitung dengan menngunakan metode LSR ( Lik ert Summated Rating ). Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu sistem informasi pengolahan data ionosfer yang dapat membantu dalam mendistribusikan data hasil pengolahan data ionosfer dengan mudah antar pegawai dan laporan kepada pimpinan. Kata kunci : CADI, GISTM/TEC, sistem informasi .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".