MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2599483383 · doi:10.1093/fs/knx075

<i>Vigée Le Brun</i> . By J <scp>oseph</scp>  B <scp>aillio</scp> , K <scp>atharine</scp>  B <scp>aetjer</scp> , and P <scp>aul</scp>  L <scp>ang</scp> ; contributions by E <scp>katerina</scp>  D <scp>eryabina</scp> , G <scp>wenola</scp>  F <scp>irmin</scp> , S <scp>téphane</scp>  G <scp>uégan</scp> , A <scp>nabelle</scp>  K <scp>ienle</scp>  P <scp>oňka</scp> , X <scp>avier</scp>  S <scp>almon</scp> , and A <scp>nna</scp>  S <scp>ulimova</scp> <i>Vigée Le Brun</i> . By BaillioJoseph, BaetjerKatharine, and LangPaul; contributions by DeryabinaEkaterina, FirminGwenola, GuéganStéphane, PoňkaAnabelle Kienle, SalmonXavier, and SulimovaAnna. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2016. x + 278 pp., ill.

2017· article· en· W2599483383 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melissa Percival

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionArt historyPortraitPaintingPoliticsArtHumanitiesHistoryLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first ever retrospective in France devoted to Élisabeth-Louise Vigée Le Brun, the prolific and successful portrait-painter, opened at the Grand Palais in September 2015. It comprised a vast 150 artworks, many of which were on public view for the first time. The vernissage at this prime venue on the Champs-Élysées was the kind of red-carpet affair that the artist would have enjoyed and felt was her due. Subsequently the exhibition — slimmed down to a still sizeable ninety works — transferred to the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the National Gallery, Ottawa. There are several reasons why this event did not happen sooner. Vigée Le Brun, an unabashed royalist, remained very Ancien Régime in her sensibilities and approach to patronage as she toured the courts of Europe after the Revolution. Although she returned to France in 1802 and lived another four decades, she never adjusted to the radically changed environment. In the nineteenth century she was effectively written out of influential histories of art. Simone de Beauvoir, who might have spearheaded a feminist revival, dismissed her as narcissistic (Le Deuxième Sexe (Paris: Gallimard, 1976), ii, 631). Her eventual rehabilitation is in no small part thanks to Joseph Baillio, who organized the only previous monographic exhibition in Fort Worth in 1982, and painstakingly continued his research, culminating in this magnificent show. Recent years have seen the appearance of feminist studies (Mary Sheriff, The Exceptional Woman: Elisabeth Vigée Lebrun and the Cultural Politics of Art (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996)), biographies (Angelica Goodden, The Sweetness of Life: A Biography of Elisabeth Louise Vigée Le Brun (London: André Deutsch, 1997); Gita May, Elisabeth Vigée Le Brun: The Odyssey of an Artist in an Age of Revolution (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005); and Geneviève Haroche-Bouzinac, Elisabeth Vigée Lebrun (Paris: Gallimard, 2015)), and several re-editions of the artist’s Souvenirs (Mémoires d’une portraitiste, ed. by Jean-Pierre Cuzin (Paris: Nouvelles éditions Scala, 2003); Memoirs of Madame Louise-Elisabeth Vigée-Lebrun (Gloucester: Dodo, 2008)). The Met’s catalogue, reviewed here, is smaller than its French counterpart, but no less of an achievement. Scholars wanting to see the fuller range of paintings, and additional essays, should look at the French catalogue, published by the Réunion des musées nationaux. The research is meticulously detailed and presented in an accessible, understated way. There is a succinct biographical essay, a crisply written overview of women artists’ dealings with the Académie, and an account of Vigée Le Brun’s travels. The real treasures, though, are the artworks themselves, generously presented in colour reproduction. Portraits have been assembled from public collections from San Francisco to Tokyo, and — this is no small achievement by the curators — a good third of the works hail from private collections. Alongside the familiar dramatis personae of pre-Revolutionary France (Marie-Antoinette, the duchesse de Polignac, finance minister Calonne) are lesser-known figures from the privileged classes of Europe. Vigée Le Brun’s Russian portraits — long hard to access — are abundantly represented. One revelation from a private collection is the Princess von und zu Liechtenstein as Iris (1793), a vibrant and mobile display of red and green. The artist’s drawings and pastels are justifiably given prominence; these include two charming studies of sleeping infants. Her Self Portrait in Traveling Costume (c. 1789–90) has a fleeting, almost vulnerable quality, a rare insight into the life she faced as an itinerant exile. A survivor in tumultuous times, Vigée Le Brun overcame many institutional and societal prejudices through sheer talent and force of personality. At last posterity has properly recognized her.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.182
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Bibliometrics, Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.422
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.182
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0370.038
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0380.014
Bibliometrics0.0140.021
Science and technology studies0.0380.031
Scholarly communication0.0220.022
Open science0.0280.027
Research integrity0.0190.027
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207