MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Reducing futile thoracotomy rates in PET-CT staged non small cell lung cancer: Clinical risk factors from a population-based review.

2013· article· en· W2599490173 on OpenAlexaff
Martin Smoragiewicz, Janessa Laskin, Don Wilson, Katherine Ramsden, Yongliang Zhai, Cheryl Ho

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLung cancerThoracotomyUnivariate analysisSurgeryPopulationOdds ratioInternal medicineMultivariate analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

7551 Background: The use of PET-CT in staging NSCLC reduces futile thoracotomy (FT) rates to approximately 30%. We aimed to identify pre-operative clinical risk factors for FT in patients (pts) staged with PET-CT. Methods: The British Columbia Cancer Agency (BCCA) provides care to 4.5 million people. A retrospective chart review was conducted on all pts referred to the BCCA in 2009-2010 who had staging PET-CT and thoracotomy for NSCLC. Exclusion criteria: tri-modality therapy, clinical N2 disease, or cancer within 5 years. FT was defined as benign lung lesion, exploratory thoracotomy, pathologic N2 disease, stage IIIB/IV, or recurrence or death < 1 year of surgery (sx). The FT and non-FT groups were compared with the Fisher test in univariate analysis and logistic regression model multivariate analysis. Results: 108 pts met inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics: male 42%, median age 67 (45-82), ECOG 0-1/+2: 85%/15%, never/former/current smoker 18.5/42.5/39%, weight loss >10% 9%. Disease characteristics: nonsquamous/ squamous histology 72/28%, median primary tumor size 3.2 cm, median SUVmax 10.1, PET + N1 24%. Median time from PET to sx 29 days. 29% pts received adjuvant chemotherapy. Thoracotomy was futile in 27 pts (25%); 14 recurred < 1 yr of sx, 10 pathologic N2 and 1 each incomplete resection, pleural disease at sx, death within 1 yr. On univariate analysis, PET + N1 (odds ratio [OR] 3.77, p 0.008) and primary tumor size > 3.2cm (OR 2.93, p 0.026) were associated with FT. On multivariate analysis, ECOG >1 (OR 4.57, p 0.017), PET + N1 status (OR 4.24, p 0.006) and primary tumor size > 3.2cm (OR 2.87, p 0.039) were associated with FT. Among the 26 pts wth PET + N1, 44% underwent FT; 23% due to N2 disease, 19% relapsed within 1 yr, 4% incomplete sx. 27% had mediastinoscopy or EBUS staging. Among the 82 pts with PET – N1,18% underwent FT; 5% due to N2 disease, 11% relapsed < 1 yr, 2% pleural dx or death < 1 yr. Conclusions: Pre-operative ECOG >1, primary tumor size > 3.2 cm and PET + N1 are associated with higher rates of FT in NSCLC. PET + N1 disease corresponds to higher rates of N2 disease and surgical staging may reduce FT in this population. These factors should be taken into consideration to reduce FT rates in NSCLC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.400 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→