MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Outcome analysis of non-high-risk neuroblastoma patients enrolled on Children’s Oncology Group trials P9641 and A3961.

2012· article· en· W2599786871 on OpenAlexaff
Holly J. Meany, Edward F. Attiyeh, Arlene Naranjo, Clare J. Twist, Wendy B. London, Judith G. Villablanca, Mary Lou Schmidt, D. Baker, Douglas Strother, Hiroyuki Shimada, Katherine K. Matthay, Susan L. Cohn, John M. Maris, Julie R. Park

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineUnivariate analysisStage (stratigraphy)OncologyLoss of heterozygosityProportional hazards modelNeuroblastomaHistologyPopulationClinical endpointClinical trialAlleleMultivariate analysisBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

9533 Background: Patients with non-high-risk neuroblastoma (low- and intermediate-risk) generally have an excellent event free (EFS) and overall (OS) survival with current therapy. However, within this heterogeneous patient population, there are patients that may benefit from further therapy reduction and patients that may benefit from augmented therapy. Methods: Survival tree regression analysis was performed in patients enrolled on P9641 and A3961 with OS the primary endpoint. Univariate Cox proportional hazards models determined statistically significant prognostic factors. Secondary analysis of cases with MYCN non-amplified, non-high-risk neuroblastoma classified patients by age, INSS stage, Shimada histology and genomic features to determine 5-year EFS and OS. Favorable genomics were defined as hyperdiploid tumors without 1p or 11q loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Those with LOH at 1p or 11q or with a diploid DNA index were considered unfavorable. Patients without genomic data were excluded. Results: In the survival tree analysis, ploidy and genomic features were found to be statistically significant. In the secondary analysis, patients <18 months of age with stage 2 or 3, favorable histology tumors with favorable genomic profile had 5-year EFS and OS rates of 92.9±3.9% and 100% respectively. Patients with stage 2 and 3 tumors, unfavorable histology and unfavorable genomic features had EFS of 68.4±8.0% and OS of 78.4±7.0%. Patients <12 months of age with stage 4 disease and either unfavorable histologic or genomic features had EFS of 69.1±5.4% and OS of 88.5±3.8%. Conclusions: Excellent outcomes in non-high-risk neuroblastoma patients with favorable histologic and genomic features suggest further reduction in therapy is possible in this cohort while maintaining survival and decreasing side effects. Select patients with unfavorable features have suboptimal OS and would benefit from modifications in therapy. Histologic and genomic criteria can be used to identify patients with non-high-risk neuroblastoma that may benefit from modifications in therapy. These data support the conduct of a cooperative group clinical trial to refine therapy for patients with non-high-risk disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.505
Teacher spread0.376 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207