MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2599866319 · doi:10.1109/vtcfall.2016.7880863

A New Performance Evaluation Metric for Radio Resource Management in Wireless Local Area Networks

2016· article· en· W2599866319 on OpenAlexaff
Hassan Halabian, Mike Skof, Afshin Sahabi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkRadio resource managementMetric (unit)Performance indicatorThroughputLocal area networkWi-FiPerformance metricWirelessWireless networkKey (lock)Wireless lanTelecommunicationsEngineeringComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose Access Point Channel Capacity (ACC) as a Key Performance Indicator (KPI) for Radio Resource Management (RRM) algorithms in 802.11 Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs). Introducing such a KPI is important especially for performance evaluation of 802.11 WLAN Self Organizing Networks (SON). ACC is a low complexity KPI that provides accurate per-AP estimate of the MAC layer potential throughput in the WLAN. The advantage of the proposed metric is that it can be derived directly from network statistics collected periodically from the access points. ACC is a vendor agnostic KPI since the required statistics are widely supported by all AP vendors and also TR-069 data model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207