Nonlinear finite element analysis of short and long reinforced concrete columns confined with GFRP tubes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents three-dimensional nonlinear finite element models to understand the uniaxial behavior of concrete-filled fiber reinforced polymer tubes. A stress–strain confined model was introduced for the concrete, a damage criteria based on Hashin's failure model was used to model damage and failure of GFRP tubes, and steel bars were modeled based on classic metal plasticity model. A comparison between experimental results found in the literature and the finite element model was conducted regarding the load-deflection curves and the failure pattern of different test specimens. The model was found to be efficient in capturing the loads and deformations of slender concrete-filled fiber reinforced polymer tube columns. It was then used in a parametric study to understand the effect of different parameters (including fiber orientation, number of layers of (glass-fiber reinforced polymer) and steel reinforcement ratio) on the behavior of concrete-filled fiber reinforced polymer tube under axial compressive loading. It was observed that the behavior of the columns was greatly affected by the investigated analysis parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it