L’écriture féminine à la Renaissance française sous le regard des chercheurs canadiens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au cours des dernières décennies, un travail considérable a été accompli par les chercheurs canadiens dans l’exhumation et la réhabilitation des textes des femmes de lettres de la Renaissance française. En raison de leur positionnement géographique à l’intersection des États-Unis et de l’Europe, ces chercheurs participent à la fois des avancées de la recherche française en matière d’érudition et des percées théoriques de la réflexion nord-américaine, enrichie par les gender studies et les études culturelles. Cela explique en partie le caractère original de leur contribution à ce champ de recherche, tant par le choix de leur objet d’étude et l’exploration de corpus marginaux que par l’approche critique et le positionnement théorique qu’ils ont adoptés. Le présent article vise à cerner la spécificité des activités de recherche menées en langue française au Canada dans les domaines bibliographique, éditorial et critique, en portant une attention particulière aux enjeux théoriques et idéologiques des choix effectués par les chercheurs. Over the past few decades, significant work has been accomplished by Canadian researchers unearthing and recovering texts by the women writers of the French Renaissance. Because of their geographical location—at the intersection of the United States and Europe—these researchers share simultaneously in the advances of French research in the discipline of scholarship and in the theoretical breakthroughs of North American thought informed by gender and cultural studies. This explains, in part, the unique character of their contribution to this field of research — as much for their chosen object of study and exploration of a marginal corpus of work as by their adoption of a certain critical approach and theoretical position. This article seeks to outline the specific features of research activities undertaken in the French language in Canada in the areas of bibliography, editing, and criticism, highlighting in particular the theoretical and ideological issues at stake in the choices made by the researchers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".