MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2599999445 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbx021.111

72. Behavioral and Neurobiological Correlates of Attention in Schizophrenia in a Virtual Environment

2017· article· en· W2599999445 on OpenAlexaff
Ishraq Siddiqui, Sarah Saperia, Susana Da Silva, Eliyas Jeffay, Jon Pipitone, Joseph D. Viviano, John A. Zawadzki, Albert H.C. Wong, Gagan Fervaha, Ofer Agid, Konstantine K. Zakzanis, Gary Remington, Aristotle N. Voineskos, George Foussias

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyFractional anisotropyCognitionNeurocognitiveSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceDiffusion MRICognitive psychologyAudiologyNeurosciencePsychiatryMedicineMagnetic resonance imaging

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Deficits in attention are an enduring feature of schizophrenia that deters cognitive capacity and ultimately functional outcome. Existing tasks of attention are typically abstract, with limited relevance to everyday life. We evaluated attention in a virtual factory setting, where participants act as quality inspectors to identify defective objects on moving conveyor belts. Further, to examine the neurobiological underpinnings of attention in this simulated real-world setting, we evaluated associations between task performance and structural brain connectivity using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Methods: The virtual tasks consist of trials evaluating Selective Attention (SA, focusing on relevant stimuli amidst distracters), Divided Attention (DA, responding simultaneously to multiple demands), and Attentional Shift (ASh, shifting attention while avoiding distractions). In a behavioural validation phase, 50 schizophrenia patients (SZ) and 55 healthy controls (HC) completed the tasks and underwent clinical and cognitive characterization. A subsample of 20 SZ and 19 HC participants underwent DTI. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were computed using probabilistic white matter tractography of frontostriatal circuits implicated in attention and cognition. Results: SZ participants performed worse than HCs on DA (Mann-Whitney U = 662.5, Z = −4.58, P < .001) and ASh (U = 560.0, Z = −5.24, P < .001), but did not differ in SA. Within the SZ group, performance on all tasks correlated with the Trail Making Test (TMT) A (Spearman’s |ρ| = 0.33–0.48, P ≤ .02), DA and ASh performance correlated with the TMT B (|ρ| = 0.33–0.46, P ≤ .02), and ASh performance correlated with cognition (ρ = 0.32, P = .03) and motivation (ρ = 0.36, P = .01). In the DTI subsample, performance on all tasks correlated with reduced MD from right caudate to orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) (|ρ| = 0.34–0.40, P ≤ .04), and ASh performance correlated with MD from right caudate to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) (ρ = −0.53, P = .001) and from left putamen to OFC (ρ = −0.36, P = .03). MD of the right caudate-DLPFC tract was also associated with ASh performance in SZ (ρ = −0.49, P = .04). Conclusion: The virtual tasks appear to be a valid means of evaluating attention, and may assess unique aspects of attention not captured by standard measures. Deficits in DA and ASh were particularly evident in SZ participants, and the latter seems associated with deficiencies in cognition and motivation that are central to the illness. The DTI findings suggest that frontostriatal circuitry may be shared across aspects of attention, but not entirely, and that deficits in ASh especially may be prominently linked with specific white matter tracts in SZ.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207