MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2600022309

Environmental Factors Influencing 20th Century Diurnal Temperature Range Variations

2011· article· en· W2600022309 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ryan G. Lauritsen

Bibliographic record

VenueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiurnal temperature variationEnvironmental scienceRange (aeronautics)ClimatologyGeographyMeteorologyGeologyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation explores the spatial-temporal patterns of diurnal temperature range (DTR) and its component variables, maximum temperature (Tmax) and minimum temperature (Tmin).The influences on DTR, Tmin, and Tmax variability from several environmental variables are also examined.Gridded time-series data from the Climate Research Unit (CRU TS 2.1) are used along with gridded Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) data and nine teleconnection indices.The study focuses on the continental United States and surrounding land areas in southern Canada and northern Mexico.Data were converted to annual and seasonal averages to reduce the impact of the annual temperature cycle.Rotated principal components analyses (RPCA) of DTR data produced five or six geographic regions of similar DTR variability for each season and annually that were used in subsequent analysis.Regionally-averaged time-series of the locally measured variables Tmin, Tmax, DTR, cloud cover, precipitation, vapor pressure, and PDSI were examined for patterns and compared across regions and seasons.Stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR) analyses were conducted with Tmin, Tmax, and DTR as the dependent variables and the other local variables (cloud cover, precipitation, vapor pressure, and PDSI) and teleconnection indices as independent variables to determine how the dependent variables impact Tmin, Tmax, and DTR variability.iii Results indicate regions of similar DTR variability occur annually and in most seasons in the west coast, southwest, central, northeast, and southeast United States.Other regions did emerge between the Great Plains and Rocky Mountains and in eastern Canada, but they were not seasonally consistent.Tmin generally showed an upward trend while the Tmax trends were usually near zero or downward.The DTR, which is the difference between Tmax and Tmin, had downward trends in many regions.SMLR analyses reveal that vapor pressure and cloud cover are the most influential variables on Tmin, Tmax, and DTR.Vapor pressure increases Tmin and Tmax, but the effect on Tmin is greater, so it tends to reduce DTR.Cloud cover increases Tmin and decrease Tmax making its impact on DTR greater than vapor pressure.Precipitation and PDSI had moderate impacts on Tmin, Tmax, and DTR but were not as consistent or influential as cloud cover and vapor pressure.The teleconnection indices used in the analysis generally had little effect on Tmin, Tmax, or DTR explaining very little (if any) of their variance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.007
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.161
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)Same topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207