MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2600032799

Epidemiological Characteristics of Deceased H1n1 Cases in Civil Hospital, Gandhinagar During First Quarter Of 2015

2016· article· en· W2600032799 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bhavesh Modi, Gaurav J. Desai, Mallika Chavada, Pranay Jadav, Bhautik Modi

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)EpidemiologyMedicineEnvironmental healthGeographyInternal medicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: In preparation for future waves of H1N1 influenza, determining the correlates of the severity of disease may be very important. Methodology: A retrospective, descriptive study was carried out at the Civil Hospital, Gandhinagar which included all the deceased patients of Influenza A H1N1 from 1st January 2015 till 31st March 2015. The admission history and their medical records including certified cause of death of all deceased H1N1 patients were collected and assessed for clinico-epidemiological details. Result: Mean age of fatal cases was 51.4 years, male to female ratio was 1:0.9 and 68% resided in Gandhinagar rural area. Majority (68%) were referred from private hospital. Almost 50% of the deceased had some form of comorbid conditions. Fever (78.9%), breathlessness (73%) and dry cough (73.7%) were reported mainly among the deaths due to H1N1. Median time, from onset of symptoms to date of admission was 4 days; whereas that from admission to death was 2 days. Conclusion: Adult age, residing in rural area, delayed referral from private practitioner, presence of comorbid conditions were found to the few reasons associated with deaths due to H1N1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.326
GPT teacher head0.614
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicGlobal Health and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207