MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2600338275 · doi:10.24198/jkip.v3i1.9351

PENGEMBANGAN MODUL PUBLIC USERS PADA SISTEM INFORMASI KEARSIPAN AKADEMIK ELEKTRONIK (Studi Action Research Pengembangan Modul Public Users Pada Sistem Informasi Kearsipan Akademik Elektronik (SiAMEL) Di Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Padjadjaran)

2015· article· id· W2600338275 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Kajian Informasi & Perpustakaan · 2015
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Methods and Media Use
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGovernment of Alberta
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research aims to know the needs of student information which can be met from SiAMEL. This research also aims to develop the database, and display the output from the application of the Public Users on SiAMEL module. The method used in this study is Action Research. Data collection techniques by way of observation, interview, note the field and study the literature. This research has resulted in the development of SiAMEL that can meet the needs of student information as Public Users among others: Data Lecturer, Data institution/ Institutions for MORNING, data proposed problem, as well as data about the schedule. Through this research has been done on the conversion some tables that are adjusted with the needs of the Public Users SiAMEL. In addition, page view early SiAMEL become open to public Users and changes to the navigation buttons (menu) SiAMEL. Some of the output SiAMEL changed some details that adjusted with the status of access authority SiAMEL, whether as administrator or as a Public Users. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kebutuhan informasi mahasiswa yang dapat dipenuhi dari SiAMEL. Selain itu juga penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan database, tampilan serta output dari aplikasi Modul Public Users pada SiAMEL. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah Action Research . Teknik pengumpulan data yaitu dengan cara observasi, wawancara, catatan lapangan, serta studi literatur. Penelitian ini telah menghasilkan pengembangan SiAMEL yang dapat memenuhi kebutuhan informasi mahasiswa sebagai Public Users antara lain: Data Dosen, Data Instansi/ Lembaga untuk PKL, data Usulan Masalah, serta data tentang Jadwal Sidang. Melalui penelitian ini telah dilakukan pengubahan pada beberapa tabel yang disesuaikan dengan kebutuhan Public Users SiAMEL. Selain itu, tampilan halaman awal SiAMEL menjadi terbuka untuk Public Users serta perubahan pada navigasi (menu) SiAMEL. Beberapa output SiAMEL diubah beberapa detail yang disesuaikan dengan status otoritas akses SiAMEL, apakah sebagai Administrator atau sebagai Public Users .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.009
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.028
Open science0.0090.004
Research integrity0.0030.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.176
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it