MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Germline mutations in seemingly sporadic pancreatic cancer.

2017· article· en· W2600362622 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cavin Wong, Adeline Cuggia, Ayelet Borgida, Spring Holter, Anita Hall, Ashton A. Connor, Mohammad R. Akbari, Steven Gallinger, George Zogopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkMount Sinai HospitalMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMSH6PALB2Germline mutationGeneticsGermlineCDKN2APMS2MSH2MLH1MedicineCancerLynch syndromeMutationCancer researchBiologyGeneColorectal cancerDNA mismatch repair

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

312 Background: Genetic predisposition underlies approximately 10% of pancreatic cancer (PC). Germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, TP53, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, PRSS1, APC, BMPR1A, STK11, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 are associated with PC susceptibility. Since young onset is not a hallmark of hereditary PC, we have hypothesized that seemingly sporadic cases may carry germline mutations in these genes. Methods: To investigate the prevalence of germline mutations in these 15 genes among sporadic PC cases, we analyzed lymphocyte DNA next generation sequencing data from 296 PC cases ascertained over 1 year from two PC referral centers in Toronto and Montreal. Results: We identified 21 mutations in 5 of the 15 genes (10 in BRCA2, 2 in BRCA1, 5 in ATM, 1 in p16, 3 in PRSS1) in 19 individuals. One individual carried two BRCA2 mutations that are usually observed together, and another individual carried both a PRSS1 and ATM mutation, however, in the absence of pancreatitis, PRSS1 mutations are not known to increase risk of PC. Incidences of 1.7% and 4.1% in ATM and BRCA-1 or -2 were observed. Approximately half of these mutations (4/9 for BRCA2, 1/2 for BRCA1, and 1/1 for p16) were known founder mutations in the French Canadian, Ashkenazi Jewish, Dutch or Asian populations. Since the role of ATMin PC predisposition remains under investigation, we obtained further evidence by testing for loss of the wild-type allele in cases with available tumor tissue. We observed loss of the wild-type allele in the 2 cases tested. Interestingly, the final pathology for the resected specimen from one of these two cases favored an ampullary cancer rather than a PC diagnosis. Conclusions: Since there are screening implications for the relatives of carriers and potentially treatment considerations for patients using therapies targeting DNA repair defects, these findings suggest a role for reflex testing of incident cases for at least population-specific recurrent mutations. Our findings also suggest that ATM germline mutations may give rise to ampullary cancer, underlie 1.4% of incident PC cases and imply broader testing considerations. For patients, testing may direct therapy choices if these tumors are targetable using agents that exploit DNA repair defects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.382 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→