MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2600559383 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2016.1562

Real‐time hardware‐in‐the‐loop simulation for islanding detection schemes in hybrid distributed generation systems

2017· article· en· W2600559383 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Generation Transmission & Distribution · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIslanding Detection in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslandingHardware-in-the-loop simulationLoop (graph theory)Computer scienceDistributed power generationDistributed generationControl engineeringEmbedded systemReal-time computingEngineeringElectrical engineeringRenewable energyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing penetration level of renewable energy brings new challenges to the field of islanding detection. In this study, a decision‐tree (DT)‐learning method with hardware‐in‐the‐loop (HIL) simulations is proposed to address the non‐detection zone (NDZ) issue of islanding detection in hybrid distributed generation systems including both inverter‐ and synchronous‐machine‐based distributed energy resources. This method can effectively reduce the NDZ through advanced relay training strategy and utilise the advantage of real‐time simulators on simulation efficiency. In addition, the generated DT can be programmed into a real relay and then get validated through HIL simulations. The HIL implementation adds a practical dimension to the proposed method. With the proposed method, the laboratory testing results indicate promising islanding detection performance in terms of dependability, security, reduced NDZ area and detection time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.737
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it