On the Design of Frequency-Invariant Beampatterns With Uniform Circular Microphone Arrays
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper deals with two critical issues about uniform circular arrays (UCAs): frequency-invariant response and steering flexibility. It focuses on some optimal design of frequency-invariant beampatterns in any desired direction along the sensor plane. The major contributions are as follows. 1) We explain how to include the steering information in the desired directivity pattern. 2) We show that the optimal approximation of the beamformer's beampattern with a UCA from a least-squares error perspective is the Jacobi-Anger expansion. 3) We develop an approach to the design of any desired symmetric directivity pattern, where the deduced beampattern is almost frequency invariant and its main beam can be pointed to any wanted direction in the sensor plane. 4) With the proposed approach, we derive an explicit form of the white noise gain (WNG) and the directivity factor (DF), and explain clearly the white noise amplification problem at low frequencies and the DF degradation at high frequencies. The analysis also indicates that increasing the number of microphones can always improve the WNG. We show that the proposed method is a generalization of circular differential microphone arrays. The relationship between the proposed method and the so-called circular harmonics beamformers is also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it