MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2600613676

Letting Something Else Happen: A Collaborative Encounter with the Work of Sharon Rosenberg

2014· article· en· W2600613676 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michelle Meagher, Roewan Crowe

Bibliographic record

VenueLiminalities · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyQueerEthosMemory workMedia studiesGender studiesLawEpistemologyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In memory of Sharon RosenbergIn July 2012, a two-day symposium was held at the University of Alberta (Edmonton, Alberta Canada), to celebrate and remember the life and work of Canadian feminist and cultural studies scholar, Dr. Sharon Michelle Rosenberg. Sharon was educated at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto and worked in the Sociology department at the University of Alberta from 2002 until her death in 2010. Her intellectual practice dealt questions surrounding trauma, memory and remembrance, and the relationship between the living and the dead. Her scholarly work spanned the fields of cultural studies, queer theory, and feminist theory. Sharon was, from the early days of her dissertation work, interested in finding ways to disrupt the limited and limiting ethos of the university and the structures that shape academic knowledge creation and representation. In a 2010 essay in Future of Memory, edited by Richard Crownshaw, Jane Kilby, and Antony Rowland, she explains: have been struggling to write, to create the space for these thoughts I find arduous to mark onto paper, for publication... (2010 252-253). Near the end of her life Sharon was working poet and writer Betsy Warland, intent to make more space for creative writing in her scholarly work (see Warland 2010 and www.betsywarland.com).When we heard that the symposium was to be held, we both immediately knew that we wanted to participate and join others in remembering Sharon. We were excited by the opportunity to meaningfully engage Sharon's tremendous theoretical contributions; and we were particularly interested in the intentions stated by the symposium's organizers. Sharon's students (Heidi Bickis, Dr. Kate Bride, Dr. Amber Dean, Dr. Kara Granzow, Dr. Rebecca Lock, and Dr. Alissa Overend) and her partner Dr. Judy Davidson, also a professor at the University of Alberta, hoped to foster an event that would embody Sharon's desire to engage in precarious theorizing - in relation to writing and thinking, in relation to teaching and pedagogy, and in relation to living (on).Rather than circulating a call for papers, the organizers produced a call to which explained the focus of the symposium: The relations between people, ideas, affects were what held her animated interest. It is this critical and passionate conversation, interrupted by her death, which we invite you to attend to - in the wake of her absence - careful, thoughtful, generous relationality. Precarious Theorizing program further explained the vision for the weekend: sparked by Sharon's longstanding interest in and love for how 'thought can move in a room, sometimes in unexpected ways' ... We hope that you will be drawn to participate not only in the usual academic-conference mode ... but instead by 'being in process' - by offering your own ideas or even 'halffinished thoughts' to be taken up not just by the presenters but also by the room... Obviously this is an experiment...This article meditates on our experience at the symposium by looking closely at our contribution to the conversation - a performance entitled Letting Something Else Happen.1 We hope to continue to engage with careful, thoughtful, generous, relationality around questions of vulnerability in the academic context. We think through these questions our performance at the conference. We use the experience of our performance to think about the nature of our collaboration, risk-taking, and the possibility of intimacy in academic settings. After describing our performance at Precarious Theorizing, we turn first to a description of Sharon's work and its influence on our project, and then to a description of the work of performance artist Marina Abramovic, whose approaches to performance, precarity, and vulnerability also informs our work. Through Sharon and Abramovic, we return to the broader work of Precarious Theorizing in an attempt to make sense of the value of bringing vulnerability, risk-taking, and collaboration into our practice. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.817
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLiminalitiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207